Showing posts with label choice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label choice. Show all posts

bake the cake and eat it, too

 Virginia home-schoolers can’t have their cake and eat it, too - The Washington Post
Back when I was a budding thespian at Rockville High School, the drama teacher — a creative whirlwind named Orville Bell — decided to do something radical: He opened auditions for the spring musical, “Oklahoma!,” to students from a nearby all-girls Catholic school. I guess he figured the girls there were getting tired of doing “The Women” every year.

I was the second cowman from the left, and if it weren’t for my dance partner from Holy Cross, I may never have learned how to pronounce “Siobhan.”

I think there was some grumbling among a few Rockville parents, but because pretty much everyone who goes out for a musical gets in and none of the three girls were in featured roles, it wasn’t a problem.
What was a problem was next year, when Mr. Bell cast a college student as El Gallo in “The Fantasticks.” Everybody knew the college student would be a great El Gallo, but surely someone at Rockville should be given the chance at the lead. Mr. Bell backed down. 
I thought of this episode when I heard about the bill before the Virginia General Assembly that would allow home-schooled students to try out for and play on public school sports teams. It’s nicknamed the“Tebow Bill,” because apparently that’s what Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow did in Florida. 
I’m against the bill for various reasons. 
There are administrative drawbacks. If students are required to maintain a certain grade-point average to be eligible for extracurricular activities, who’s to say the home-schooled kid’s principal, homeroom teacher or guidance counselor — i.e., Mom, Mom and Mom — isn’t going to bump up Jimmy’s English grade from a C to a B just so he can start at wide receiver? 
Maybe schools should rethink their grading policies. Grades are proven to be ineffective and grading systems within the US are unequal and punitive by class. Grading is unnecessary and harmful; assessment can be ongoing and some teachers are dropping grading altogether.

Grading is a way schools routinely disallow many kids from sports. Schools do not see their job to be helping every kid who wants to play football play. Schools see their job as offering football to a chosen, qualified few.  The high school sports industry has a poor record of looking out for student health and wellness, cheerleaders are no longer coed, and the school culture around football games is overblown and often toxic.

The author continues:
But my main objection is philosophical. 
School does a lot of things, just one of which is educating students. School is a place children learn to get along, learn what it means to work in a group, to navigate the shoals of cliques and conflicts. It’s where you learn some of the basics of what it means to be a citizen. 
This is incorrect: schools do not teach any sort of positive socialization. Even in well-heeled districts, toxic socialization breeds peer-dependence, bullying, and cheating as well as an attitude of entitlement and a tacit acceptance of authoritarian methods. Perhaps we could say that mass school socialization creates the lack of empathy for others and an acceptance of authoritarian methods. That may be the core experience. Take a look at our political culture and think about it.

In August in the Deep South, we have kids in football gear with constant heat issues because of the massively centralized school system that ignores local climate and conditions. It's time for football in cooler locales and so everyone is on the schedule and that schedule is unrelated to climate.  If we had not massively centralized, no doubt we would have far more diversity of school cultures instead of the pasturized and processed football culture. Lots of schools would still develop different cultural activities if football wasn't one of the official school activities and there was some sort of democratic and local input.

Human children are not designed for authoritarian factories. And families and communities have changed in the past 30 years. Families in the US have scant time off, unlike other industrialized countries. Many US families have no health care and most have health care that is time intensive and of wildly varying quality. Families are increasingly poor, stressed and fractured. Communities are strapped and segregated and bowling alone. Schools have mounting cadres of police as well as heavy corporate involvement in the form of useless textbooks, standardized tests, core curriculum goals and various initiatives sought by corporateers interested in the bottom line but uninterested in what families want or need.

Grading for elementary students used to be U or S and a hot meal was cooked on site and there was recess and lots of walking to and fro. Now our schools grade and test even the youngest students and food is an abomination. From the one-room schoolhouse to the massively-centralized system we now live with has been a long journey and most working-class families struggle to cope with schools' intransigence, exploding fees and increasing suspensions and medication. The author also says:
We often despair about our public schools in this country, but they’ve been a common experience for millions of us. If you happen to not agree with that common experience, you might decide, as is your right, to home-school your child. 
You may have all sorts of reasons. Perhaps our public schools are too secular for you. Or maybe our public schools aren’t rigorous enough for you. Maybe our public schools aren’t safe enough for you. Maybe you love your children more than the rest of us love ours and you just want them around you all the time. 
There is not one common experience within the schools unless it is the decline of personal empathy for others and a innate acceptance of authoritarian tactics and ranking and sorting. That might be the true socialization experience of mass schooling. But there are many school communities with issues beyond who plays the lead role in a school play. Suspension rates in some areas are astounding, children and families are demoralized instead of energized.
“They just want to try out,” the bill’s sponsor, Del. Robert B. Bell (R-Charlottesville), told The Washington Post’s Anita Kumar. “They just want a chance to participate with their friends, their neighbors, their community members.” 
Guess what: They do have the chance. They can go to public school.
“I was disappointed to not have the opportunities that others did,” said a 17-year-old Leesburg home-schooled soccer player. 
You do have the opportunities. Yes, taking advantage of those opportunities would mean trading your living room for a classroom, and I can see why you might not want to do that, but life is full of difficult choices. You can’t always depend on others to make them easy for you. 
I’m not against home-schooling. I’m against people wanting to pick and choose the parts of a public education they agree with.
Public education system isn't much interested in the public. It's a business that doesn't care about its users. Parents have no voice or say in how their children are educated in a vast system that enforces its legal mandate with police.

Forced schooling may have begun with a few years of basic skills taught but we now enforce a massively long attendance because the entire system depends on the money tied to that attendance. Families are greatly diminished in power by this institution that grew large without any structural way of relating to families other than to use its police arm. And that means schools are increasingly becoming militarized. Family disenfranchisement plays a large part in the vast amount of money spent since families cannot help target services by participating.

Every family should be able to pick and choose classes at their school. Schools manufacture credentials instead of providing learning services. That a critical distinction; credential manufacture is a factory model, top-down process. Providing families and their children learning resources is different. The users of the system should be the people the schools work with and accommodate in a learning services model. If schools would value the users of the school, they could find that their choices drive the system.

Who else are the schools for?

More:

Should Home-Schoolers Play for the High School Team? - Room for Debate - NYTimes.com


FrenchKingCakeMagazineStJan2008
New Orleans King Cake, French style, By Infrogmation of New Orleans (Photo by Infrogmation),
licensed by GFDL or CC-BY-SA -3.0, via Wikimedia Commons


school choice isn't much choice

English: Alton C. Crews Middle School from ent...
Alton C. Crews Middle School,
public domain image
via Wikipedia
School choice.  What a buzzword. Like free trade. Or tax relief. And like these other terms, it is not really true. School choice is sure not much choice at all for most people. But for those locked into the mass coerced structure of public schooling as it stands, almost any choice is better than nothing. The words school choice is appealing because there is no choice at all within the whole institutional structure. 

School choice is a choice of schools: it is not choice within a school and it is not a choice of schedule, courses and approach. It is a choice of schools that fit the myriad laws, regulations, and corporate supply chains that define them. These schools will follow the same massive guidelines and agendas, whatever the small differences they offer. An easy way to comprehend how little choice there is in school choice, is to imagine what real choice would look like.
  • Schools could send out surveys asking what district families need and then work to provide those services
  • Schools could provide families part-time options, full-time options, and extra-time options and any combination of these
  • Schools could offer a core curriculum that covered the basics in 2-3 hours a day and then build on that or not, as the family wanted
  • Schools could offer classes all day and into the evening and on Saturdays
  • Schools could provide transportation databases online where you can carpool and coordinate pickups; it would include bikes, too and bike-building sessions for those that need them
  • Schools could provide gardens, kitchens, and real food
  • Schools could provide resources like pianos and instruments for every kid who wants to learn, not just those in "band"
  • Schools could provide lots of classes and support groups where they share strategies on building your learning plan for your child
  • Schools could provide small business incubators  for teens
  • Schools could stop grading but provide lots of feedback on how your child was doing, conferences, online documents and extensive counseling support 
  • Schools could provide game nights, tutoring every night, speakers and events almost constantly and for families, not just kids
  • Schools could see their mission as providing learning services for families rather than policing families to provide kids for them to manufacture to spec
Now is it getting clearer?

We do not have school choice nor any choices is our system of mass, coerced schooling with its compulsory attendance laws.  School choice has appeal because what everyone wants is choice. Parents pay for the system, parents live with the child, parents have the strongest direct interest in helping the child succeed, and parents have absolutely no choices.

Do you want to attend every day for 180 days a year or be put in jail? Do you want to cajole, coerce and force your child into attending or be prosecuted by the state?

Choosing Democracy: Why School Choice Fails:
"IF you want to see the direction that education reform is taking the country, pay a visit to my leafy, majority-black neighborhood in Washington. While we have lived in the same house since our 11-year-old son was born, he’s been assigned to three different elementary schools as one after the other has been shuttered. Now it’s time for middle school, and there’s been no neighborhood option available. 
Meanwhile, across Rock Creek Park in a wealthy, majority-white community, there is a sparkling new neighborhood middle school, with rugby, fencing, an international baccalaureate curriculum and all the other amenities that make people pay top dollar to live there.
Such inequities are the perverse result of a “reform” process intended to bring choice and accountability to the school system. Instead, it has destroyed community-based education for working-class families, even as it has funneled resources toward a few better-off, exclusive, institutions."
background posts
blaming families, juvenile justice edition
bullying families and children
every parent should have real choices

REPOST: what real choice would look like

From February 2011. The choice debate is framed within a very narrow band where the choices are almost useless.  Choice means a private school voucher or stay in a public school, perhaps a failing one, it increases privatization and allows takeover of public resources. That's it.  Do you want war in Iraq or Afghanistan?

Is that a real choice?

How about these choices:
  • Schools that ask families in their districts what learning services they need and want?
  • What about all the families who want more classes and weekend classes?  
  • What about parents, in the same district, who just want 2-3 classes and the rest homeschool?
  • What about parents who want better food? Can they work directly with their school to improve food? Can schools get gardens started? 
  • What about no tests unless the family chooses to take the test?
  • How about a lot of programs for parents that explain choices families can make for their child's education: how to prepare for college, etc.
  • What about families who need before and/or afterschool care and want good programs for that?
  • What about kids who can't afford a piano and want lessons which, of course, would be educational but are not in the curriculum? Can schools get several pianos and even more keyboards? Can they run a loaner program?
  • How about multi-age programs that offer broad social experiences?
  • How about lots of field trips that parents can choose to attend or not?
  •  What about drop-outs who hate school and want to work or start a business?  Where is the startup incubator with teen mentoring?  
  • How about choices that allow families to choose classes their kids need for career pr
  • Why can't they just attend and try things and make mistakes without penalty while they find out what they enjoy?  
  • What about having different texts and approaches to the same material?  Homeschoolers can and do adjust to a child's needs but schools cannot because pouring everyone into the same mold is an endless task.  
  • How about 1/3 (or all) of every schedule has real electives -- not the assigned ones but real electives. How about a choice for a 2/3 schedule of classes? Or just one class? 
  • How about a choice to take specific day off, say Wednesday because that's your Dad's only day off? 
  • How about a school database and support for carpooling and resource sharing? 
  • How about purchasing art materials at a discount with an art club?
We need choice to drive the system, we need families and children making a whole lot of choices all along the way to maximize the quality and target resources most effectively. And real choices for real families could start right within the schools we already have. Most kids never get to choose much of anything at all. Sometimes there is a tightly-controlled elective choice that isn't really a choice either as for most kids, the classes are filled so quick or there are schedule conflicts that make it impossible. The one fake choice is just a throwaway. We have a top-down, standardized, factory manufacturing approach to education and working hard to get the factory in tip-top shape will not provide what families need and want.

Compulsory attendance mandates the number of days, the number of hours, the curriculum, and the everything else so that there is absolutely no customization whatsoever or money doesn't flow. This structure has guided the money along upward paths that include wider and wider circles of bureaucrats and education experts in remote areas. The focus by schools is up: toward the city, state and Federal authorities who choose and mandate and centralize the income stream and then pour it all back down, a form of trickle down.

There is absolutely no focus on families and their children, other than policing them if they challenge the income stream. Families provide the money and the children and then are told to get out of the way: experts are in charge. Compulsory attendance gave the schools a police tool which is a mechanism to resist pushback from the very people they should be serving; it is a relic and with the growing corporate takeover of government, the ill effects of mass schooling in citizens is being felt for what it is: acculturation to hierarchy and passive acceptance of authoritarian structures.

Schools could be run as a service for families.  Families getting the right to homeschool is a first step. The next step is moving toward all families getting a substantial voice in a service that should be run for the families.

background posts

total flex time

So how could the schools ever allow families to pick and choose services when our entire accreditation industry relies on number of hours in the seat?  I have blogged about how ending credential manufacture means supporting students and allowing them to build a path to credentials of many kinds, in fact, this is how homeschooling works. And businesses, too, are changing from the factory models and finding surprising things:

How flexible work actually works - Fortune Management:
FORTUNE -- At MeetingMatrix International, a communications firm based in Portsmouth, N.H., employees have no defined work schedules, unlimited paid time off, and meetings are optional. How do they ever get any work done? That's actually the only thing that matters: results. 
MeetingMatrix executives point to longer customer support hours, increased sales during a down economy, and 100% retention as evidence that their focus on the end results -- and not hours in the office -- works.
And this also:
"When you start treating people like adults, they start acting like it," says the company's CEO Jmichaele Keller, who in 2008 shelved his company's employee monitoring systems in favor of a more flexible approach. Under the new regime, "people have a lot of ability to shape what is going on in their world and not a lot of micromanaging.... There really is no direct tie in an office environment between the amount of time spent and the productivity of that individual." 
MeetingMatrix is among 262 organizations to win an Alfred P. Sloan award for excellence in workplace effectiveness and flexibility this year, the winners of which were announced today by the Families and Work Institute and the Society for Human Resource Management.