So if modernized societies are beginning to discuss moving from 20th century “big-box” schooling to a more 21st century “open-source” model of learning, one possibility is that we may see a convergence of learning styles between ancient and modern cultures. As Sugata Mitra has discovered, unlettered street children can teach themselves how to use computers when given free access to the technology. So does it make sense to remove indigenous children from their traditional cultures and put them into outdated factory-style schools? Or should traditional people consider skipping that step, and deciding for themselves how they may want to use, ignore, adapt, blend, or hybridize new technologies and information in an open-source self-regulating manner?
When a new form of knowledge is truly vital and desired by a population, and access to the necessary resources is available, there is no question of needing to make education compulsory — you couldn’t stop the spread of knowledge if you tried. Look at how computer technology and expertise spread through the developed world. Personal computers were not invented by people in schools, and the vast majority of the population did not learn how to use them in schools. It was an open-source process – an organically expanding, networking, self-correcting, self-regulating and incredibly effective process – just like the early spread of literacy in many parts of Europe before the institution of widespread schooling.
a mother and citizen blogging about compulsory attendance laws and democracy, in support of deschooling, homeschooling, unschooling, school at home, community-run schools, democratic schools, cooperative schools, DIY, publicly-funded open-source learning centers in neighborhoods and networked across wider communities, learning commons, and all grassroots alternatives
big box schooling
A post up at Schooling the World, the future of big box schooling (via Cooperative Catalyst) is a good read:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment